Newspaper Bits, Pieces and Clippings
Following are bits, pieces and
clippings from old newspapers. These give us wonderful glimpses into the lives of our
ancestors. If you have any newspaper stories/clippings you would like to add, please forward
them to Rhonda Stolte Darnell. Please be considerate and do not forward material which is copyrighted by someone else. |
||
Bowling Green Times May 6, 1937 |
||
Bowling Green Times May 6, 1937
Two cases were tried in the Justice of the Peace Court held in the Probate Court room Wednesday morning at ten o'clock. These cases were, the City of Bowling Green vs. Claude Shaon and V. S. Williams which grew out of a failure to pay the city gasoline tax. It appears that in the past the gasoline companies have been paying the city tax of one cent per gallon for their dealers localed [sic] in the city, however, recently both the Shell Oil Company and the Continental Oil Company notified city officials they would refuse to pay the tax and it is reported these companies also advised their dealers Messrs. Williams and Shaon to refuse payment. Under the City Ordinance a penalty of $10.00 per day is assessed for failure to pay the tax and after hearing the evidence a jury composed of Guy Fowler, Clay Keith, Allie Dougherty, Hugh Ogle, Bland Shepherd and William Mays assessed a fine of $10.00 each against the defendants. The defendants, through attorney Lewellen, took an appeal to the Circuit Court and posted bond in the sum of $75.00 each. The city gasoline tax, assessed by many cities throughout the state, has been a bone of contention for a number of years and it now looks as though the higher courts will be called upon to settle once and for all the issue which, no doubt, will be watched by all municipalities assessing a gasoline tax as well sa by all gasoline companies and it is believed other cities will join in the court proceedings as apparently have some of the major oil companies and with a penalty assessed of $10.00 per day it is quite apparent the case could run into a luxurious one should the upper courts uphold the city's right to assess the tax. Upon the other hand, should the cases be decided against the city, it no doubt would be necessary to devise other means of raising revenue to replace that lost through the gasoline tax. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
More Newsy Bits and Pieces
Page 1 | Page
2 | Page 3
| Page 4 | Page
5
Page 6
| Page 7
| Page 8
| Page 9
| Page 10
Page 11
| Page 12
| Page 13
| Page 14
| Page 15
Page 16
| Page 17
| Page 18
| Page 19
| Page 20
|